Data sources / Licensing and regulatory

EPA ECHO

Environmental compliance and enforcement information assembled from covered regulatory programs and facility records. Facility identifiers and reporting systems determine which sites and activities appear in a particular search.

Last reviewed · report an error

Publisher
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Access
Free
Coverage
Environmental compliance and enforcement information assembled from covered regulatory programs and facility records. Facility identifiers and reporting systems determine which sites and activities appear in a particular search.
Identifiers
Facility Registry Service (FRS) identifier; Program-specific permit or facility identifier
Freshness
varies

What it can establish

Use EPA ECHO for a defined acquisition-research question. Match each record to the right entity using its identifiers (Facility Registry Service (FRS) identifier, Program-specific permit or facility identifier) before accepting its contents, and keep U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's own scope and attribution on the finding.

  • Published facility, program, permit and compliance information within the scope of the selected record.
  • A dated regulatory lead about a site's reported environmental status, inspections or enforcement activity requiring contextual review.

What it cannot establish

  • A complete environmental liability assessment, the absence of contamination or comprehensive compliance across every location in a group.
  • That every similarly named facility belongs to the target, or that a historic enforcement issue remains unresolved today.

A search that returns nothing in EPA ECHO describes the search performed. Coverage here is environmental compliance and enforcement information assembled from covered regulatory programs and facility records, so a missing record becomes a negative finding only where that coverage reaches the company in question and the evidence standard supports the inference. Otherwise the question stays open.

How Docket uses it

Your acquisition criteria become the agents' questions. EPA ECHO can support some of them and leave others unanswered; its freshness (varies) is weighed answer by answer and it receives no blanket reliability score.

  • Triage. Connects the facility address and identifier to the intended operator before accepting a regulatory match.
  • Scout. Collects program-specific status and dates, keeping the original classification and facility scope visible.
  • Audit. Checks whether retained evidence justifies the wording and whether a group-level conclusion improperly extends a site-level observation.

Scout records typed answers from a fixed list with verbatim quotations from retained pages. Audit reviews only the retained material, with every fetch tool denied. It settles supported contradictions, strikes unquotable answers and leaves gaps visible. See the research-agent method and screening criteria guide for the surrounding workflow.

Pitfalls and review questions

  • One physical facility can have several program records. Avoid counting each permission as a distinct operating company.
  • Reporting delays and changes of operator complicate attribution. Separate the site, its current operator and the entity named in historical events before raising diligence questions.

What ECHO brings together

Enforcement and Compliance History Online is the Environmental Protection Agency's portal for facility-level compliance data across several federal programmes covering air, water, hazardous waste and others. A facility page shows its location, the programmes it is regulated under, inspection history, violations, enforcement actions and penalties, as reported by the programmes' source systems. The portal offers bulk downloads with data dictionaries.

Each facility has an identifier in the agency's Facility Registry Service, which links records across programmes. The linking helps where one site appears under different names in different programmes, but the links are made from reported data and can contain errors. ECHO shows regulated facilities only; it is not a census of businesses.

Interpreting the facility record

A facility may be listed because it holds a permit, reports emissions, or has been inspected. A listing says it is regulated, not that it is in violation. Data sources differ in their timeliness, and the portal notes which are stale. Violations should be read with their status: some are resolved, some remain open, and some are classified as significant or high priority under programme rules.

The owner or operator named may differ from the entity that holds the site now, particularly after sales. Match the facility to the legal entity through the address, the operator name and the dates, and record unresolved cases as such. For asset-heavy targets, environmental history can matter to value, so treat any ECHO finding as a diligence lead for specialist review.

Illustration (fictional)

A researcher screening a specialty chemicals distributor looks up its two sites. One is listed under a hazardous-waste programme with a closed inspection and no violations; the other appears under an air programme with a resolved violation from four years earlier. The researcher records the facility identifiers, notes the dates, and marks the operator names for comparison with the registry, since one site appears under a former owner's name.

Sources and further reading

  • Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Facility-level compliance and enforcement history across several federal environmental programs.
  • ECHO data downloads, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Bulk files and data dictionaries for facility records.
  • Facility Registry Service, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA's facility identifier that links records across programs.
  • OSHA Establishment Search, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The public search of OSHA inspections and citations by establishment name. The site answers scripted requests with 403 but loads in a browser.

These links identify research contexts to investigate, rather than conclusions about sector attractiveness. Ask how EPA ECHO would be used on your list or return to the complete source directory.

Send us ten targets. We research them for free.

A target list and your acquisition criteria are enough. You get back company records with scores, the evidence behind every field, and the questions the public record could not answer.