Distribution and logistics

Third-party logistics origination playbook

Separate brokerage, warehousing and fulfillment before comparing customer contracts, operating assets and execution risk.

Last reviewed · report an error

A research template, not investment advice. Figures are not stated where the public record does not support them.

Sector
Third-party logistics
2022 U.S. NAICS

488510 · Freight Transportation Arrangement

493110 · General Warehousing and Storage

Classification limits
Starting points for discovery, not a complete niche definition. Classify the actual activity and verify scope against the U.S. Census NAICS reference.

Understand the operating model

Third-party logistics can mean freight brokerage, warehousing, fulfillment or combinations of those services. The same brand may operate warehouses while arranging transport through carriers it does not own. Map the legal entities and service responsibilities rather than treating the umbrella term as one comparable business model.

Revenue may be billed per shipment, storage unit, order, handling task or contracted capacity. Gross billings and economic contribution can differ sharply where carrier costs are passed through. Facility specialization, customer systems and local operations can support distinct providers, but network affiliates and subcontracted capacity need explicit treatment.

A service-platform hypothesis asks whether operating processes and customer integrations support reliable execution. Test it against site and shipment records. It weakens where one customer fills a facility, carrier relationships depend on one broker, or minimum commitments and lease obligations create a mismatch between promised capacity and flexible demand.

What makes a target worth investigating?

These are fit hypotheses to test against your mandate. They are not verified attributes of any company or a prediction of acquisition performance.

  • A defined service mix with brokerage, storage, fulfillment and any owned transport shown separately.
  • Customer obligations and operating capacity attributable to identifiable entities and facilities.
  • Management coverage for operations, carrier relationships and systems beyond the principal owner.

Screening questions for Scout

Tailor these questions before collection. Each accepted answer needs a supporting verbatim excerpt from a retained page. Options describe permitted answers, not default assumptions. When no source supports an answer, leave it unanswered; absence from a website is not a “no.” See screening criteria for defining gates and weights.

QuestionAnswer typeOptionsWhy it matters
Which logistics model is described?one ofBrokerage / Warehousing / Fulfillment / MixedSeparates different revenue recognition, asset and execution profiles.
Is transport performed using an owned or operated fleet?yes/noSource-supported entriesFlags carrier activity and a different capital and safety perimeter from arrangement alone.
Which warehouse services are explicitly offered?listSource-supported entriesRecord storage, pick-pack, returns and specialist handling rather than inferring a full-service network.
Which customer systems or integrations are documented?listSource-supported entriesCreates questions about switching effort, implementation cost and actual system ownership.
Are specialist storage or handling conditions offered?yes/noSource-supported entriesFlags technical scope and customer requirements needing direct verification.
Does an excerpt show this stop condition: A pure carrier outside a brokerage or warehouse mandate?yes/noSource-supported entriesTriage applies this gate before research is paid for. It needs a quoted excerpt and the written mandate; silence leaves the question open and never answers yes or no.
Does an excerpt show this stop condition: Specialist handling, geography or customer exposure outside the buyer's operating capabilities?yes/noSource-supported entriesA second gate checked before detailed collection. An unresolved fact stays open for review; it does not become a negative finding.
Does the record support this fit hypothesis: A defined service mix with brokerage, storage, fulfillment and any owned transport shown separately?yes/noSource-supported entriesTreat it as a hypothesis to test against the mandate, not a verified attribute of the company. Unsupported answers stay unanswered.
Suggested question schema. Financial mix, retention and operating performance usually require direct records at a later stage.

Four questions apply to every playbook (ownership category, locations, sale process, exclusions) and are listed once on the playbooks overview.

What public evidence can establish

Match every source to the correct entity, location and collection date. Use the data-source directory to choose discovery paths, and evidence standards to decide what an excerpt actually supports.

SignalWhere to lookLimits
Transport operating identity
FMCSA company records matched to disclosed carrier identifiers where relevant.

Source guide →

A snapshot is not a complete check of brokerage authority, insurance or every affiliate.
Facility capabilities
Warehouse pages specifying locations and handling services.

Source guide →

Marketing capacity does not establish usable capacity, occupancy or lease control.
Service integration
Public documentation describing order, warehouse and transport connections.

Source guide →

Integration claims do not establish production use or transferable software rights.
Network changes
Dated facility openings and acquisition announcements.

Source guide →

An announcement may describe planned capacity rather than a functioning operation.
Legal identity and trading names
State entity records matched against the website's legal notices and contact details.

Source guide →

Registration establishes an entity, not its ultimate beneficial ownership, operating scale or willingness to transact.
Current operating roles
Dated vacancies describing supervisors, delivery staff and administrative responsibilities.

Source guide →

Vacancies describe hiring intentions. They do not establish filled positions, employee totals or an imminent succession event.

Ownership and succession signals

  • A principal who controls carrier procurement and key shipper relationships may be a continuity dependency even with staffed facilities. Establish responsibility without assuming personal exit plans.
  • Compare dated leadership pages with entity records and transaction announcements. A missing management biography is an evidence gap, not proof that the owner lacks a successor.
  • These are research signals, not proof of intent to sell. Confirm control, decision rights and succession preferences directly through an approved conversation before treating them as transaction facts.

Read succession and ownership before turning a continuity question into an ownership claim.

Reasons to stop or separate the record

Apply a disqualifier only when supported by evidence and your written mandate. Unresolved facts stay open for review; they do not become negative findings.

  • A pure carrier outside a brokerage or warehouse mandate.
  • Specialist handling, geography or customer exposure outside the buyer's operating capabilities.
  • Unresolved entity or facility control that prevents attribution of the advertised service network.

Approach with context and approval

  • State the relevant service model and geography, and avoid implying that customer contracts automatically transfer.
  • Do not request shipment-level customer information before confidentiality and authorized diligence arrangements.
  • The client approves each target and the messaging before contact. Check suppression records and applicable channel requirements; coordinate email, LinkedIn and phone so the business receives one coherent approach.

Use the outreach compliance guide to define channel requirements and suppression handling before optional outreach begins.

Questions for later diligence

These require direct records, management access and appropriate specialist review. Public screening identifies the questions; it cannot settle them.

  • Reconcile customer billing, carrier costs and site contribution under the applicable accounting treatment.
  • Review concentration, minimum commitments, lease terms, claims history and subcontractor controls.
  • Assess warehouse systems, labor requirements, facility utilization and customer change-of-control provisions.

Use these theses to frame confirming and disconfirming evidence, then choose a sourcing method suited to the target universe.

Adjacent playbooks

Where to check this

A logistics company can be an asset-based carrier, a freight broker or a warehousing provider, and each is registered differently. FMCSA's Company Snapshot shows registration, operating authority and inspection data for carriers and brokers; the Transportation Intermediaries Association is the trade body for the brokerage side. Warehousing and contract logistics are not covered by FMCSA at all.

Sources

  • Company Snapshot, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Registration, authority, fleet and inspection data for interstate carriers and brokers.
  • Transportation Intermediaries Association, TIA. Trade association for freight brokers and third-party logistics providers.
  • North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), U.S. Census Bureau. The classification every federal dataset keys on, and the first thing a market map has to get right.
  • County Business Patterns (CBP), U.S. Census Bureau. Establishment counts, employment and payroll by NAICS code and county. The spine of any honest market map.
  • About Statistics of U.S. Businesses (SUSB), U.S. Census Bureau. Defines the firm, establishment and enterprise-size units SUSB tabulates by NAICS industry, which is what separates a count of companies from a count of locations.
  • Table of size standards, U.S. Small Business Administration. The revenue or employee threshold that defines a small business for each NAICS code: a program-eligibility test, not a lower-middle-market definition.

Related articles

Send us ten targets. We research them for free.

A target list and your acquisition criteria are enough. You get back company records with scores, the evidence behind every field, and the questions the public record could not answer.